Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security Released

Share this article:


Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security, the world’s first book dedicated to the subject of the security of blockchain applications, has been released. The book is written by smart contract security experts at Quantstamp.

Security is Essential for Blockchain Applications

While blockchains themselves are often secured by large amounts of hashpower, applications running on top of them, in the form of smart contracts, can be subject to coding errors or security vulnerabilities just like any other software. Unlike regular software though, smart contracts are often directly in charge of assets, and once they are written to a blockchain, they cannot be changed. In some cases, the smart contract code also is viewable by others accessing the blockchain.  This makes secure smart contract development essential.

Written by Smart Contract Security Experts

Quantstamp is a Y Combinator-backed blockchain security company which has audited over $800 million worth of smart contracts. We are among the first to have built a decentralized automated smart contract security analyzer network deployed on the worldwide Ethereum blockchain and our team has 5 PhDs, including security and formal verification experts.

Actionable Advice

Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security provides actionable advice on blockchain security. It goes beyond theory, giving real practical advice, including common vulnerabilities detected in the wild, and best practices for secure smart contract development.

“Smart contracts and programmable money enable a wealth of new possibilities, but their immutable and public nature means security must be given top priority. This book will teach you how.” - Eric Ly, Co-founder, LinkedIn, and CEO of Hub Token

Buy the Book today

Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security is available for order today at Amazon.com as well as Momentum Press.

Sample chapters of the book can be read online here, courtesy of Momentum Press.

About Quantstamp

Quantstamp is a Y Combinator-backed blockchain security company developing automated security tools such as the Quantstamp protocol and also conducts expert smart contract audits. Powered by QSP, the Quantstamp protocol aims to enhance smart contract security and the reputation of projects that create smart contracts by producing openly accessible security reports.

Back
Quantstamp Announcements

September 2026: The Approval Layer Was Exploited

Crypto lost $742.0M across 33 incidents in September 2026, almost three times August's $255.5M and the biggest month of the year so far. Bitget's $387M hack and Liquid Network's $320M exploit account for about 95% of that, with the other 31 incidents adding up to $35.0M. In August, the prices going into contracts were wrong. In September, attackers went after the systems that approve transactions in the first place. Here's the month in security 👇

Read more
about September 2026: The Approval Layer Was Exploited
Quantstamp Announcements

August 2026: The Price Feed Was Exploited

Crypto lost $255.4M across 46 incidents in August 2026, roughly level with July's $254.4M, with more incidents than any month this year. June and July incidents were largely due to key compromises, but August shifted to price manipulation. Eleven oracle and price-manipulation incidents accounted for $135.87M, or 53% of the month. Two chains stopped producing blocks and rolled back state to undo the damage. Here's the month in security 👇

Read more
about August 2026: The Price Feed Was Exploited
Quantstamp Announcements

July Security Beat: Keys Over Code (Again?)

Crypto lost more than $240 million across 29 incidents in July 2026, up roughly 216% from June's $75.87M, even as the number of attacks fell from 40 to 29. For the second month running, the damage didn't come from clever contract exploits. The same failure class ran through Web2, from a $12.3M rail-industry ransom to a 1TB bank breach that started with one employee's email. Here's the month in security 👇

Read more
about July Security Beat: Keys Over Code (Again?)